1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
ATC Brokers vs MIF: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of ATC Brokers (ATC Brokers) and MIF (PT. MANDIRI INVESTINDO FUTURES) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- ATC Brokers 6D Score
- 6.0
- MIF 6D Score
- 1.2
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
ATC Brokers outranks MIF by +4.8 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 1.2)
On supervisory breadth, ATC Brokers holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MIF holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | ATC Brokers | MIF | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 1.2 | +4.8 | ATC Brokers |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 1.2 | +4.8 | ATC Brokers |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | ATC Brokers |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 1.2 | +4.8 | ATC Brokers |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.2 | +3.8 | ATC Brokers |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: ATC Brokers vs MIF
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | ATC Brokers | MIF |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | ATC Brokers | PT. MANDIRI INVESTINDO FUTURES |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | BAPPEBTI: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | No 1 Poultry London EC2R 8EJ United Kingdom | Gedung Graha HSBC lt.9 Jl. Basuki Rahmat 58-60, RW 03 Kelurahan Tegalsari Kecamatan Tegalsari. Surabaya Jawa Timur Kode Pos 60262 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, Futures, Options | Foreign exchange, gold, crude oil |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare ATC Brokers and MIF against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: ATC Brokers vs MIF
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: ATC Brokers or MIF?
ATC Brokers holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, ATC Brokers maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (NFA, CIMA, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MIF maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (BAPPEBTI) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between ATC Brokers and MIF?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), ATC Brokers records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with MIF at 1.2 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.2, Brand: 1.2, Market Influence: 1.2, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do ATC Brokers and MIF differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
ATC Brokers lists Forex, Futures, Options with execution software [MT4], while MIF lists Foreign exchange, gold, crude oil with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: ATC Brokers or MIF?
ATC Brokers carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MIF carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.