Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

MIF vs StoneX One: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of MIF (PT. MANDIRI INVESTINDO FUTURES) and StoneX One (StoneX Financial Inc.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

MIF 6D Score
1.2
StoneX One 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 5
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: mif-vs-stonex-one

StoneX One outranks MIF by +3.8 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.2)

On supervisory breadth, MIF holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas StoneX One holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightMIFStoneX OneScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite1.25.0+3.8StoneX One
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight1.25.0+3.8StoneX One
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.03.0+2.0StoneX One
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight1.25.0+3.8StoneX One
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight1.25.0+3.8StoneX One

Visual Architecture Benchmark: MIF vs StoneX One

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: MIF vs StoneX One
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between MIF and StoneX One.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeMIFStoneX One
Primary Legal NamePT. MANDIRI INVESTINDO FUTURESStoneX Financial Inc.
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
BAPPEBTI: Not supplied
Registered Domicile / AddressGedung Graha HSBC lt.9 Jl. Basuki Rahmat 58-60, RW 03 Kelurahan Tegalsari Kecamatan Tegalsari. Surabaya Jawa Timur Kode Pos 60262230 S LaSalle St #10-500 Chicago, IL 60604
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForeign exchange, gold, crude oilIndices, Forex, Commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare MIF and StoneX One against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: MIF vs StoneX One

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: MIF or StoneX One?

StoneX One holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 1). Specifically, MIF maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (BAPPEBTI) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas StoneX One maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (NFA, MAS, ASIC, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between MIF and StoneX One?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), MIF records an Overall Score of 1.2 (Risk & Licensing: 1.2, Brand: 1.2, Market Influence: 1.2, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with StoneX One at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do MIF and StoneX One differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

MIF lists Foreign exchange, gold, crude oil with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while StoneX One lists Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: MIF or StoneX One?

MIF carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while StoneX One carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

MIF vs StoneX One (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk