Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

MIF vs Straits Financial Group: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of MIF (PT. MANDIRI INVESTINDO FUTURES) and Straits Financial Group (Straits Financial Group) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

MIF 6D Score
1.2
Straits Financial Group 6D Score
6.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: mif-vs-straits-financial-group

Straits Financial Group outranks MIF by +4.8 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 1.2)

On supervisory breadth, MIF holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Straits Financial Group holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightMIFStraits Financial GroupScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite1.26.0+4.8Straits Financial Group
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight1.26.0+4.8Straits Financial Group
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.04.0+3.0Straits Financial Group
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight1.25.0+3.8Straits Financial Group
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight1.26.0+4.8Straits Financial Group

Visual Architecture Benchmark: MIF vs Straits Financial Group

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: MIF vs Straits Financial Group
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between MIF and Straits Financial Group.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeMIFStraits Financial Group
Primary Legal NamePT. MANDIRI INVESTINDO FUTURESStraits Financial Group
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
BAPPEBTI: Not supplied
Registered Domicile / AddressGedung Graha HSBC lt.9 Jl. Basuki Rahmat 58-60, RW 03 Kelurahan Tegalsari Kecamatan Tegalsari. Surabaya Jawa Timur Kode Pos 602629 Temasek Boulevard #28-02 Suntec Tower Two Singapore 038989
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForeign exchange, gold, crude oilStock products, futures, energy or precious metals, commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare MIF and Straits Financial Group against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: MIF vs Straits Financial Group

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: MIF or Straits Financial Group?

Both MIF and Straits Financial Group hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, MIF maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (BAPPEBTI) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Straits Financial Group maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (CFTC, MAS, NFA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between MIF and Straits Financial Group?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), MIF records an Overall Score of 1.2 (Risk & Licensing: 1.2, Brand: 1.2, Market Influence: 1.2, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Straits Financial Group at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do MIF and Straits Financial Group differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

MIF lists Foreign exchange, gold, crude oil with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Straits Financial Group lists Stock products, futures, energy or precious metals, commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: MIF or Straits Financial Group?

MIF carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Straits Financial Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

MIF vs Straits Financial Group (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk