Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Activotrade vs Beverly Hills: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Activotrade (Activotrade) and Beverly Hills (Beverly Hills) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

Activotrade 6D Score
5.0
Beverly Hills 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: activotrade-vs-beverly-hills

Activotrade and Beverly Hills are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Activotrade holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Beverly Hills holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightActivotradeBeverly HillsScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Activotrade vs Beverly Hills

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Activotrade vs Beverly Hills
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Activotrade and Beverly Hills.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeActivotradeBeverly Hills
Primary Legal NameActivotradeBeverly Hills
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressC/ Av. Diagonal 309, 6a planta, Barcelona 08013, Spain811 N Doheny Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90210-3528
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocks, ETFs, CFDs, Forex, Options, Futures and BondsFutures, options, stocks, fixed income, alternative investments, algorithmic trading, investment grade diamonds
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Activotrade and Beverly Hills against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Activotrade vs Beverly Hills

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Activotrade or Beverly Hills?

Activotrade holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Activotrade maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CNMV) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Beverly Hills maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Activotrade and Beverly Hills?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Activotrade records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Beverly Hills at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do Activotrade and Beverly Hills differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Activotrade lists Stocks, ETFs, CFDs, Forex, Options, Futures and Bonds with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Beverly Hills lists Futures, options, stocks, fixed income, alternative investments, algorithmic trading, investment grade diamonds with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Activotrade or Beverly Hills?

Activotrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Beverly Hills carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Activotrade vs Beverly Hills (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk