1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Beverly Hills vs StoneX One: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Beverly Hills (Beverly Hills) and StoneX One (StoneX Financial Inc.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- Beverly Hills 6D Score
- 5.0
- StoneX One 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 5
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Beverly Hills and StoneX One are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Beverly Hills holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas StoneX One holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Beverly Hills | StoneX One | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Beverly Hills vs StoneX One
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Beverly Hills | StoneX One |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Beverly Hills | StoneX Financial Inc. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 811 N Doheny Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90210-3528 | 230 S LaSalle St #10-500 Chicago, IL 60604 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Futures, options, stocks, fixed income, alternative investments, algorithmic trading, investment grade diamonds | Indices, Forex, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Beverly Hills and StoneX One against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Beverly Hills vs StoneX One
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Beverly Hills or StoneX One?
StoneX One holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 0). Specifically, Beverly Hills maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas StoneX One maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (NFA, MAS, ASIC, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Beverly Hills and StoneX One?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Beverly Hills records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with StoneX One at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Beverly Hills and StoneX One differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Beverly Hills lists Futures, options, stocks, fixed income, alternative investments, algorithmic trading, investment grade diamonds with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while StoneX One lists Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Beverly Hills or StoneX One?
Beverly Hills carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while StoneX One carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.