Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Activotrade vs Straits Financial Group: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Activotrade (Activotrade) and Straits Financial Group (Straits Financial Group) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

Activotrade 6D Score
5.0
Straits Financial Group 6D Score
6.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: activotrade-vs-straits-financial-group

Straits Financial Group outranks Activotrade by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Activotrade holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Straits Financial Group holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightActivotradeStraits Financial GroupScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.06.0+1.0Straits Financial Group
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.06.0+1.0Straits Financial Group
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.04.0+1.0Straits Financial Group
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.06.0+1.0Straits Financial Group

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Activotrade vs Straits Financial Group

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Activotrade vs Straits Financial Group
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Activotrade and Straits Financial Group.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeActivotradeStraits Financial Group
Primary Legal NameActivotradeStraits Financial Group
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressC/ Av. Diagonal 309, 6a planta, Barcelona 08013, Spain9 Temasek Boulevard #28-02 Suntec Tower Two Singapore 038989
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocks, ETFs, CFDs, Forex, Options, Futures and BondsStock products, futures, energy or precious metals, commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Activotrade and Straits Financial Group against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Activotrade vs Straits Financial Group

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Activotrade or Straits Financial Group?

Both Activotrade and Straits Financial Group hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Activotrade maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CNMV) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Straits Financial Group maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (CFTC, MAS, NFA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Activotrade and Straits Financial Group?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Activotrade records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Straits Financial Group at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do Activotrade and Straits Financial Group differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Activotrade lists Stocks, ETFs, CFDs, Forex, Options, Futures and Bonds with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Straits Financial Group lists Stock products, futures, energy or precious metals, commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Activotrade or Straits Financial Group?

Activotrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Straits Financial Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Activotrade vs Straits Financial Group (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk