30-Jurisdiction Statutory Audit • South Africa (ZA)
Is uBinary Regulated in South Africa? (FSCA Compliance Audit)
Deterministic regulatory audit of uBinary (uBinary) against South Africa's national supervisor (Financial Sector Conduct Authority), statutory investor compensation limits, and retail margin rules.
Coverage: South Africa (ZA) • Supervisor: FSCA (Tier-2 Onshore)
- Local FSCA Filings
- 0
- Total Global Licences
- 0
- 6D Overall Score
- 1.0
- Regime Classification
- Tier-2
Switch National Jurisdiction Audit (30 Statutory Regimes)
← Back to uBinary Main DossierSouth Africa (FSCA) Statutory Compliance Matrix for uBinary
Side-by-side comparison of South Africa's statutory requirements against uBinary's recorded filings.
| Statutory Dimension | South Africa (FSCA) Mandate | uBinary Recorded Standing |
|---|---|---|
| National Supervisory Authority | Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) | No Active Licence Recorded |
| Local Certificate Number(s) | Mandatory registration on official FSCA public register | None recorded in South Africa |
| Statutory Investor Compensation Cap | No statutory OTC derivative compensation fund; ODP licensing & margin rules apply | Not covered by South Africa domestic scheme when onboarded offshore |
| Retail Leverage & Margin Cap | Contractual ODP Margin Schedule under Financial Markets Act Regulations | Governed by foreign/offshore subsidiary contract terms |
| Client Money Segregation Rule | FAIS Act Section 19 Separate Client Trust Account & External Audit | Verify daily trust reconciliation & negative balance protection in client agreement |
uBinary — South Africa (FSCA) Compliance Exhibit
Deterministic vector diagram of local licensing, investor protection, and leverage constraints.
Top 5 Regulated Peers for South Africa (FSCA) Comparison
Benchmark uBinary against peer institutions in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
| Institution | Recorded Licences | 6D Score | Risk Classification | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AvaTrade | FSAFFAJASIC | 6.0 | Risk level not supplied | |
| OANDA | ASICFSANFA | 9.1 | Risk level not supplied | |
| Saxo | FSAAMFFINMA | 7.0 | Risk level not supplied | |
| Straits Financial Group | CFTCMASNFA | 6.0 | Risk level not supplied | |
| StoneX One | NFAMASASIC | 5.0 | Risk level not supplied |
uBinary in South Africa (FSCA): Frequently Asked Questions
Statutory licensing, compensation cap, and leverage answers.
Is uBinary regulated in South Africa by FSCA?
Our dataset currently holds 0 local FSCA licences and 0 active foreign regulated licences for uBinary. Residents of South Africa should verify primary authorisation directly on the FSCA public register before transacting.
What is the investor compensation limit for South Africa residents using uBinary?
Because uBinary does not hold a recorded local FSCA licence in our current snapshot, South Africa's domestic statutory compensation scheme (No statutory OTC derivative compensation fund; ODP licensing & margin rules apply) does not cover accounts opened with uBinary's foreign or offshore subsidiaries.
What retail leverage cap and margin rules apply in South Africa (FSCA)?
Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) enforces the following retail leverage and margin standard in South Africa: Contractual ODP Margin Schedule under Financial Markets Act Regulations, alongside client asset protection rules requiring FAIS Act Section 19 Separate Client Trust Account & External Audit.
Which regulated alternatives to uBinary hold licences in South Africa or comparable tiers?
Comparable institutions in this directory include AvaTrade (6.0/10, 8 filings), OANDA (9.1/10, 6 filings), Saxo (7.0/10, 8 filings), Straits Financial Group (6.0/10, 3 filings), StoneX One (5.0/10, 5 filings). Use the 1v1 Compare links in the table above to benchmark uBinary against each peer.
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.