1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
StoneX One vs uBinary: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of StoneX One (StoneX Financial Inc.) and uBinary (uBinary) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- StoneX One 6D Score
- 5.0
- uBinary 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 5 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
StoneX One outranks uBinary by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, StoneX One holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas uBinary holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | StoneX One | uBinary | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | StoneX One |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | StoneX One |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | StoneX One |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | StoneX One |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | StoneX One |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: StoneX One vs uBinary
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | StoneX One | uBinary |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | StoneX Financial Inc. | uBinary |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 230 S LaSalle St #10-500 Chicago, IL 60604 | FR |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Indices, Forex, Commodities | Options |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare StoneX One and uBinary against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: StoneX One vs uBinary
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: StoneX One or uBinary?
StoneX One holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 0). Specifically, StoneX One maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (NFA, MAS, ASIC, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas uBinary maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between StoneX One and uBinary?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), StoneX One records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with uBinary at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do StoneX One and uBinary differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
StoneX One lists Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while uBinary lists Options with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: StoneX One or uBinary?
StoneX One carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while uBinary carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.