1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
rubilink vs StoneX One: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of rubilink (rubilink) and StoneX One (StoneX Financial Inc.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- rubilink 6D Score
- 1.0
- StoneX One 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 5
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
StoneX One outranks rubilink by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, rubilink holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas StoneX One holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | rubilink | StoneX One | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | StoneX One |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | StoneX One |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | StoneX One |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | StoneX One |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | StoneX One |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: rubilink vs StoneX One
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | rubilink | StoneX One |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | rubilink | StoneX Financial Inc. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Jsquare Nihonbashi 2F, Nihonbashi | 230 S LaSalle St #10-500 Chicago, IL 60604 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Technology services | Indices, Forex, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare rubilink and StoneX One against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: rubilink vs StoneX One
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: rubilink or StoneX One?
StoneX One holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 1). Specifically, rubilink maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (FFAJ) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas StoneX One maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (NFA, MAS, ASIC, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between rubilink and StoneX One?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), rubilink records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with StoneX One at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do rubilink and StoneX One differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
rubilink lists Technology services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while StoneX One lists Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: rubilink or StoneX One?
rubilink carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while StoneX One carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.