1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
PLOTIO vs rubilink: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of PLOTIO (PLOTIO) and rubilink (rubilink) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- PLOTIO 6D Score
- 5.0
- rubilink 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
PLOTIO outranks rubilink by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, PLOTIO holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas rubilink holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | PLOTIO | rubilink | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | PLOTIO |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | PLOTIO |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | PLOTIO |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 1.0 | +5.0 | PLOTIO |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 1.0 | +5.0 | PLOTIO |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: PLOTIO vs rubilink
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | PLOTIO | rubilink |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | PLOTIO | rubilink |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Capital Union Building, Suite 6, Lyford Cay, West Bay Street, Nassau, The Bahamas 1st Floor, The Sotheby Building, Rodney Bay, Gros-Islet, Castries, Saint Lucia | Jsquare Nihonbashi 2F, Nihonbashi |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Spot and CFDs commodities such as gold, silver, currency CFDs, crude oil futures, natural gas futures and indices | Technology services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare PLOTIO and rubilink against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: PLOTIO vs rubilink
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: PLOTIO or rubilink?
PLOTIO holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, PLOTIO maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (CGSE, ASIC, SCB) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas rubilink maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FFAJ) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between PLOTIO and rubilink?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), PLOTIO records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with rubilink at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do PLOTIO and rubilink differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
PLOTIO lists Spot and CFDs commodities such as gold, silver, currency CFDs, crude oil futures, natural gas futures and indices with execution software [MT4, MT5], while rubilink lists Technology services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: PLOTIO or rubilink?
PLOTIO carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while rubilink carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.