1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
PT.Java Global Futures vs rubilink: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of PT.Java Global Futures (PT.Java Global Futures) and rubilink (rubilink) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- PT.Java Global Futures 6D Score
- 4.0
- rubilink 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
PT.Java Global Futures outranks rubilink by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (4.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, PT.Java Global Futures holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas rubilink holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | PT.Java Global Futures | rubilink | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | PT.Java Global Futures |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | PT.Java Global Futures |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | PT.Java Global Futures |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | PT.Java Global Futures |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | PT.Java Global Futures |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: PT.Java Global Futures vs rubilink
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | PT.Java Global Futures | rubilink |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | PT.Java Global Futures | rubilink |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Foresta Business Loft 5 Unit 15 Jl. BSD Boulevard, Lengkong Kulon Pagedangan Tangerang Banten 15331 | Jsquare Nihonbashi 2F, Nihonbashi |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Currency pairs, metals, energies, Asian stocks and more | Technology services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Indonesian, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare PT.Java Global Futures and rubilink against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: PT.Java Global Futures vs rubilink
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: PT.Java Global Futures or rubilink?
Both PT.Java Global Futures and rubilink hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, PT.Java Global Futures maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ICDX) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas rubilink maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FFAJ) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between PT.Java Global Futures and rubilink?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), PT.Java Global Futures records an Overall Score of 4.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with rubilink at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do PT.Java Global Futures and rubilink differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
PT.Java Global Futures lists Currency pairs, metals, energies, Asian stocks and more with execution software [MT5], while rubilink lists Technology services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: PT.Java Global Futures or rubilink?
PT.Java Global Futures carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while rubilink carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.