1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Beverly Hills vs tastyfx: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Beverly Hills (Beverly Hills) and tastyfx (tastyfx) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- Beverly Hills 6D Score
- 5.0
- tastyfx 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Beverly Hills and tastyfx are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Beverly Hills holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas tastyfx holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Beverly Hills | tastyfx | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Beverly Hills vs tastyfx
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Beverly Hills | tastyfx |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Beverly Hills | tastyfx |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 811 N Doheny Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90210-3528 | 1330 WEST FULTON STREET, SUITE 610 CHICAGO 60607 IL United States |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Futures, options, stocks, fixed income, alternative investments, algorithmic trading, investment grade diamonds | FX, price difference, futures |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | tastyfx: Forex Trading Broker |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Beverly Hills and tastyfx against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Beverly Hills vs tastyfx
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Beverly Hills or tastyfx?
tastyfx holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Beverly Hills maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas tastyfx maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (NFA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Beverly Hills and tastyfx?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Beverly Hills records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with tastyfx at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Beverly Hills and tastyfx differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Beverly Hills lists Futures, options, stocks, fixed income, alternative investments, algorithmic trading, investment grade diamonds with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while tastyfx lists FX, price difference, futures with execution software [tastyfx: Forex Trading Broker]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Beverly Hills or tastyfx?
Beverly Hills carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while tastyfx carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.