30-Jurisdiction Statutory Audit • South Korea (KR)
Is whitebit Regulated in South Korea? (FSC Compliance Audit)
Deterministic regulatory audit of whitebit (whitebit) against South Korea's national supervisor (Financial Services Commission / Financial Supervisory Service (FSS)), statutory investor compensation limits, and retail margin rules.
Coverage: South Korea (KR) • Supervisor: FSC (Tier-1 Onshore)
- Local FSC Filings
- 0
- Total Global Licences
- 5
- 6D Overall Score
- 5.0
- Regime Classification
- Tier-1
Switch National Jurisdiction Audit (30 Statutory Regimes)
← Back to whitebit Main DossierSouth Korea (FSC) Statutory Compliance Matrix for whitebit
Side-by-side comparison of South Korea's statutory requirements against whitebit's recorded filings.
| Statutory Dimension | South Korea (FSC) Mandate | whitebit Recorded Standing |
|---|---|---|
| National Supervisory Authority | Financial Services Commission / Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) (FSC) | Cross-Border / Non-FSC (5 Foreign Filings) |
| Local Certificate Number(s) | Mandatory registration on official FSC public register | None recorded in South Korea |
| Statutory Investor Compensation Cap | KRW 50,000,000 KDIC (Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation for cash balances) | Not covered by South Korea domestic scheme when onboarded offshore |
| Retail Leverage & Margin Cap | 10:1 Retail FX Margin (10% minimum initial margin under FSCMA) | Governed by foreign/offshore subsidiary contract terms |
| Client Money Segregation Rule | FSCMA Mandatory Korea Securities Finance Corporation (KSFC) Client Deposit Custody | Verify daily trust reconciliation & negative balance protection in client agreement |
whitebit — South Korea (FSC) Compliance Exhibit
Deterministic vector diagram of local licensing, investor protection, and leverage constraints.
Top 5 Regulated Peers for South Korea (FSC) Comparison
Benchmark whitebit against peer institutions in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
| Institution | Recorded Licences | 6D Score | Risk Classification | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OANDA | ASICFSANFA | 9.1 | Risk level not supplied | |
| Saxo | FSAAMFFINMA | 7.0 | Risk level not supplied | |
| AvaTrade | FSAFFAJASIC | 6.0 | Risk level not supplied | |
| Straits Financial Group | CFTCMASNFA | 6.0 | Risk level not supplied | |
| StoneX One | NFAMASASIC | 5.0 | Risk level not supplied |
whitebit in South Korea (FSC): Frequently Asked Questions
Statutory licensing, compensation cap, and leverage answers.
Is whitebit regulated in South Korea by FSC?
Our dataset records 0 local FSC licences for whitebit in South Korea, though whitebit holds 5 active licence(s) in other jurisdictions (Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register), Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS), CNB, Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF)). Residents of South Korea onboarding via a foreign or offshore subsidiary do NOT receive domestic FSC supervision or KRW 50,000,000 KDIC (Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation for cash balances).
What is the investor compensation limit for South Korea residents using whitebit?
Because whitebit does not hold a recorded local FSC licence in our current snapshot, South Korea's domestic statutory compensation scheme (KRW 50,000,000 KDIC (Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation for cash balances)) does not cover accounts opened with whitebit's foreign or offshore subsidiaries.
What retail leverage cap and margin rules apply in South Korea (FSC)?
Financial Services Commission / Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) (FSC) enforces the following retail leverage and margin standard in South Korea: 10:1 Retail FX Margin (10% minimum initial margin under FSCMA), alongside client asset protection rules requiring FSCMA Mandatory Korea Securities Finance Corporation (KSFC) Client Deposit Custody.
Which regulated alternatives to whitebit hold licences in South Korea or comparable tiers?
Comparable institutions in this directory include OANDA (9.1/10, 6 filings), Saxo (7.0/10, 8 filings), AvaTrade (6.0/10, 8 filings), Straits Financial Group (6.0/10, 3 filings), StoneX One (5.0/10, 5 filings). Use the 1v1 Compare links in the table above to benchmark whitebit against each peer.
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.