30-Jurisdiction Statutory Audit • Netherlands (NL)
Is InterPan Regulated in Netherlands? (AFM Compliance Audit)
Deterministic regulatory audit of InterPan (InterPan) against Netherlands's national supervisor (Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (Autoriteit Financiële Markten)), statutory investor compensation limits, and retail margin rules.
Coverage: Netherlands (NL) • Supervisor: AFM (Tier-1 Onshore)
- Local AFM Filings
- 0
- Total Global Licences
- 1
- 6D Overall Score
- 3.0
- Regime Classification
- Tier-1
Switch National Jurisdiction Audit (30 Statutory Regimes)
← Back to InterPan Main DossierNetherlands (AFM) Statutory Compliance Matrix for InterPan
Side-by-side comparison of Netherlands's statutory requirements against InterPan's recorded filings.
| Statutory Dimension | Netherlands (AFM) Mandate | InterPan Recorded Standing |
|---|---|---|
| National Supervisory Authority | Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (Autoriteit Financiële Markten) (AFM) | Cross-Border / Non-AFM (1 Foreign Filings) |
| Local Certificate Number(s) | Mandatory registration on official AFM public register | None recorded in Netherlands |
| Statutory Investor Compensation Cap | €20,000 DCS/ICS (Dutch Investor Compensation Scheme per person per institution) | Not covered by Netherlands domestic scheme when onboarded offshore |
| Retail Leverage & Margin Cap | 30:1 Major FX / 20:1 Non-Major FX (AFM National CFD Product Intervention) | Governed by foreign/offshore subsidiary contract terms |
| Client Money Segregation Rule | Wft Statutory Giro/Custody Foundation (Stichting Derdengelden) Ring-Fencing | Verify daily trust reconciliation & negative balance protection in client agreement |
InterPan — Netherlands (AFM) Compliance Exhibit
Deterministic vector diagram of local licensing, investor protection, and leverage constraints.
Top 5 Regulated Peers for Netherlands (AFM) Comparison
Benchmark InterPan against peer institutions in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
| Institution | Recorded Licences | 6D Score | Risk Classification | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OANDA | ASICFSANFA | 9.1 | Risk level not supplied | |
| Saxo | FSAAMFFINMA | 7.0 | Risk level not supplied | |
| AvaTrade | FSAFFAJASIC | 6.0 | Risk level not supplied | |
| Straits Financial Group | CFTCMASNFA | 6.0 | Risk level not supplied | |
| StoneX One | NFAMASASIC | 5.0 | Risk level not supplied |
InterPan in Netherlands (AFM): Frequently Asked Questions
Statutory licensing, compensation cap, and leverage answers.
Is InterPan regulated in Netherlands by AFM?
Our dataset records 0 local AFM licences for InterPan in Netherlands, though InterPan holds 1 active licence(s) in other jurisdictions (ICDX). Residents of Netherlands onboarding via a foreign or offshore subsidiary do NOT receive domestic AFM supervision or €20,000 DCS/ICS (Dutch Investor Compensation Scheme per person per institution).
What is the investor compensation limit for Netherlands residents using InterPan?
Because InterPan does not hold a recorded local AFM licence in our current snapshot, Netherlands's domestic statutory compensation scheme (€20,000 DCS/ICS (Dutch Investor Compensation Scheme per person per institution)) does not cover accounts opened with InterPan's foreign or offshore subsidiaries.
What retail leverage cap and margin rules apply in Netherlands (AFM)?
Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (Autoriteit Financiële Markten) (AFM) enforces the following retail leverage and margin standard in Netherlands: 30:1 Major FX / 20:1 Non-Major FX (AFM National CFD Product Intervention), alongside client asset protection rules requiring Wft Statutory Giro/Custody Foundation (Stichting Derdengelden) Ring-Fencing.
Which regulated alternatives to InterPan hold licences in Netherlands or comparable tiers?
Comparable institutions in this directory include OANDA (9.1/10, 6 filings), Saxo (7.0/10, 8 filings), AvaTrade (6.0/10, 8 filings), Straits Financial Group (6.0/10, 3 filings), StoneX One (5.0/10, 5 filings). Use the 1v1 Compare links in the table above to benchmark InterPan against each peer.
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.