30-Jurisdiction Statutory Audit • Singapore (SG)
Is BingX Regulated in Singapore? (MAS Compliance Audit)
Deterministic regulatory audit of BingX (BingX) against Singapore's national supervisor (Monetary Authority of Singapore), statutory investor compensation limits, and retail margin rules.
Coverage: Singapore (SG) • Supervisor: MAS (Tier-1 Onshore)
- Local MAS Filings
- 0
- Total Global Licences
- 4
- 6D Overall Score
- 6.0
- Regime Classification
- Tier-1
Switch National Jurisdiction Audit (30 Statutory Regimes)
← Back to BingX Main DossierSingapore (MAS) Statutory Compliance Matrix for BingX
Side-by-side comparison of Singapore's statutory requirements against BingX's recorded filings.
| Statutory Dimension | Singapore (MAS) Mandate | BingX Recorded Standing |
|---|---|---|
| National Supervisory Authority | Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) | Cross-Border / Non-MAS (3 Foreign Filings) |
| Local Certificate Number(s) | Mandatory registration on official MAS public register | None recorded in Singapore |
| Statutory Investor Compensation Cap | SDIC (Bank deposits up to S$100,000; CMS capital-markets accounts rely on trust ring-fencing) | Not covered by Singapore domestic scheme when onboarded offshore |
| Retail Leverage & Margin Cap | 20:1 Retail FX (5% margin floor; 50:1 Accredited Investors under SFA) | Governed by foreign/offshore subsidiary contract terms |
| Client Money Segregation Rule | SFA (Licensing and Conduct of Business) Regulations Customer Money Trust Segregation | Verify daily trust reconciliation & negative balance protection in client agreement |
BingX — Singapore (MAS) Compliance Exhibit
Deterministic vector diagram of local licensing, investor protection, and leverage constraints.
Top 5 Regulated Peers for Singapore (MAS) Comparison
Benchmark BingX against peer institutions in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
| Institution | Recorded Licences | 6D Score | Risk Classification | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OANDA | ASICFSANFA | 9.1 | Risk level not supplied | |
| Saxo | FSAAMFFINMA | 7.0 | Risk level not supplied | |
| Straits Financial Group | CFTCMASNFA | 6.0 | Risk level not supplied | |
| StoneX One | NFAMASASIC | 5.0 | Risk level not supplied | |
| KGI | MAS | 5.0 | Risk level not supplied |
BingX in Singapore (MAS): Frequently Asked Questions
Statutory licensing, compensation cap, and leverage answers.
Is BingX regulated in Singapore by MAS?
Our dataset records 0 local MAS licences for BingX in Singapore, though BingX holds 3 active licence(s) in other jurisdictions (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC), Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register)). Residents of Singapore onboarding via a foreign or offshore subsidiary do NOT receive domestic MAS supervision or SDIC (Bank deposits up to S$100,000; CMS capital-markets accounts rely on trust ring-fencing).
What is the investor compensation limit for Singapore residents using BingX?
Because BingX does not hold a recorded local MAS licence in our current snapshot, Singapore's domestic statutory compensation scheme (SDIC (Bank deposits up to S$100,000; CMS capital-markets accounts rely on trust ring-fencing)) does not cover accounts opened with BingX's foreign or offshore subsidiaries.
What retail leverage cap and margin rules apply in Singapore (MAS)?
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) enforces the following retail leverage and margin standard in Singapore: 20:1 Retail FX (5% margin floor; 50:1 Accredited Investors under SFA), alongside client asset protection rules requiring SFA (Licensing and Conduct of Business) Regulations Customer Money Trust Segregation.
Which regulated alternatives to BingX hold licences in Singapore or comparable tiers?
Comparable institutions in this directory include OANDA (9.1/10, 6 filings), Saxo (7.0/10, 8 filings), Straits Financial Group (6.0/10, 3 filings), StoneX One (5.0/10, 5 filings), KGI (5.0/10, 1 filings). Use the 1v1 Compare links in the table above to benchmark BingX against each peer.
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.