1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
StoneX One vs XBMarkets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of StoneX One (StoneX Financial Inc.) and XBMarkets (Redpine Capital Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- StoneX One 6D Score
- 5.0
- XBMarkets 6D Score
- 6.0
- Regulated Licences
- 5 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
XBMarkets outranks StoneX One by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, StoneX One holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas XBMarkets holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | StoneX One | XBMarkets | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | XBMarkets |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | XBMarkets |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | XBMarkets |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 7.0 | +2.0 | XBMarkets |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | XBMarkets |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: StoneX One vs XBMarkets
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | StoneX One | XBMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | StoneX Financial Inc. | Redpine Capital Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 230 S LaSalle St #10-500 Chicago, IL 60604 | Vasili Michaelidi 21-23, Areti Tower, 2nd Floor, 3026 Limassol, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Indices, Forex, Commodities | Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Metals, Energies |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Polish, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare StoneX One and XBMarkets against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: StoneX One vs XBMarkets
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: StoneX One or XBMarkets?
StoneX One holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 1). Specifically, StoneX One maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (NFA, MAS, ASIC, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas XBMarkets maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between StoneX One and XBMarkets?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), StoneX One records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with XBMarkets at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).
How do StoneX One and XBMarkets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
StoneX One lists Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while XBMarkets lists Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Metals, Energies with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: StoneX One or XBMarkets?
StoneX One carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while XBMarkets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.