Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

SCDEX vs Shadow Exchange: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of SCDEX (SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE) and Shadow Exchange (Shadow Exchange) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

SCDEX 6D Score
9.3
Shadow Exchange 6D Score
2.3
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: scdex-vs-shadow-exchange

SCDEX outranks Shadow Exchange by +7.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (9.3 vs 2.3)

On supervisory breadth, SCDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Shadow Exchange holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightSCDEXShadow ExchangeScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite9.32.3+7.0SCDEX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight9.52.3+7.2SCDEX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight9.32.0+7.3SCDEX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight9.20.0+9.2SCDEX
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight9.42.3+7.1SCDEX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight9.12.3+6.8SCDEX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: SCDEX vs Shadow Exchange

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: SCDEX vs Shadow Exchange
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between SCDEX and Shadow Exchange.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeSCDEXShadow Exchange
Primary Legal NameSCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGEShadow Exchange
Source Risk ClassificationLow riskRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / Address1312 17th Street Suite 692, Denver, COLORADO 80202International
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCrypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, RemittancesTrading
Execution Software & TerminalsSCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading EngineProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese, ThaiEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare SCDEX and Shadow Exchange against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: SCDEX vs Shadow Exchange

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: SCDEX or Shadow Exchange?

Both SCDEX and Shadow Exchange hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, SCDEX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (NFA, FinCEN) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Shadow Exchange maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between SCDEX and Shadow Exchange?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), SCDEX records an Overall Score of 9.3 (Risk & Licensing: 9.5, Brand: 9.4, Market Influence: 9.1, User Reputation: 9.2, Execution & Software: 9.3), compared with Shadow Exchange at 2.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.3, Brand: 2.3, Market Influence: 2.3, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do SCDEX and Shadow Exchange differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

SCDEX lists Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances with execution software [SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine], while Shadow Exchange lists Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: SCDEX or Shadow Exchange?

SCDEX carries a "Low risk" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Shadow Exchange carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

SCDEX vs Shadow Exchange (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk