1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
IronFX vs Scalable Capital: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of IronFX (Notesco Financial Services Limited.) and Scalable Capital (Scalable Capital GmbH) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- IronFX 6D Score
- 3.0
- Scalable Capital 6D Score
- 3.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
IronFX and Scalable Capital are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, IronFX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Scalable Capital holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | IronFX | Scalable Capital | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: IronFX vs Scalable Capital
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | IronFX | Scalable Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Notesco Financial Services Limited. | Scalable Capital GmbH |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | BaFin: Not suppliedFinancial Conduct Authority: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 12Th Floor, The BroadGaTe Tower 20 PriMrose STreeT London EC2A 2EW UNITED KINGDOM | Seitzstraße 8e, 80538 München, Germany |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Metals, Commodities | Cryptocurrencies |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare IronFX and Scalable Capital against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: IronFX vs Scalable Capital
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: IronFX or Scalable Capital?
Both IronFX and Scalable Capital hold 2 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, IronFX maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, Financial Conduct Authority, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Scalable Capital maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (BaFin, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between IronFX and Scalable Capital?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), IronFX records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with Scalable Capital at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do IronFX and Scalable Capital differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
IronFX lists Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Metals, Commodities with execution software [MT4], while Scalable Capital lists Cryptocurrencies with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: IronFX or Scalable Capital?
IronFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Scalable Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.