1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Inter Pan vs Scalable Capital: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Inter Pan (PT. INTER PAN PASIFIK FUTURES) and Scalable Capital (Scalable Capital GmbH) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- Inter Pan 6D Score
- 5.0
- Scalable Capital 6D Score
- 3.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Inter Pan outranks Scalable Capital by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, Inter Pan holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Scalable Capital holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Inter Pan | Scalable Capital | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Inter Pan |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Inter Pan |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Inter Pan |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Inter Pan |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Inter Pan |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Inter Pan vs Scalable Capital
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Inter Pan | Scalable Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | PT. INTER PAN PASIFIK FUTURES | Scalable Capital GmbH |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | BaFin: Not suppliedFinancial Conduct Authority: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Lippo St. Moritz Office Tower Lt.10 Unit. 1005, Jl. Puri Indah Raya Blok U1 Kembangan, Jakarta Barat 11610. | Seitzstraße 8e, 80538 München, Germany |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, indices, commodities, multiple side | Cryptocurrencies |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Inter Pan and Scalable Capital against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Inter Pan vs Scalable Capital
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Inter Pan or Scalable Capital?
Both Inter Pan and Scalable Capital hold 2 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Inter Pan maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (ICDX, ICDX) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Scalable Capital maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (BaFin, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Inter Pan and Scalable Capital?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Inter Pan records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Scalable Capital at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Inter Pan and Scalable Capital differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Inter Pan lists FX, indices, commodities, multiple side with execution software [MT5], while Scalable Capital lists Cryptocurrencies with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Inter Pan or Scalable Capital?
Inter Pan carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Scalable Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.