1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Inter Pan vs rubilink: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Inter Pan (PT. INTER PAN PASIFIK FUTURES) and rubilink (rubilink) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- Inter Pan 6D Score
- 5.0
- rubilink 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Inter Pan outranks rubilink by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, Inter Pan holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas rubilink holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Inter Pan | rubilink | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | Inter Pan |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | Inter Pan |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | Inter Pan |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | Inter Pan |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | Inter Pan |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Inter Pan vs rubilink
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Inter Pan | rubilink |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | PT. INTER PAN PASIFIK FUTURES | rubilink |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Lippo St. Moritz Office Tower Lt.10 Unit. 1005, Jl. Puri Indah Raya Blok U1 Kembangan, Jakarta Barat 11610. | Jsquare Nihonbashi 2F, Nihonbashi |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, indices, commodities, multiple side | Technology services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Inter Pan and rubilink against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Inter Pan vs rubilink
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Inter Pan or rubilink?
Inter Pan holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, Inter Pan maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (ICDX, ICDX) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas rubilink maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FFAJ) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Inter Pan and rubilink?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Inter Pan records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with rubilink at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Inter Pan and rubilink differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Inter Pan lists FX, indices, commodities, multiple side with execution software [MT5], while rubilink lists Technology services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Inter Pan or rubilink?
Inter Pan carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while rubilink carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.