Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Fidelity International vs MagnetFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Fidelity International (Fidelity International) and MagnetFX (MagnetFX) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

Fidelity International 6D Score
5.0
MagnetFX 6D Score
6.5
Regulated Licences
1 vs 2
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fidelity-international-vs-magnetfx

MagnetFX outranks Fidelity International by +1.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.5 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Fidelity International holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MagnetFX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFidelity InternationalMagnetFXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.06.5+1.5MagnetFX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.06.5+1.5MagnetFX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.04.0+1.0MagnetFX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.06.5+1.5MagnetFX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.06.5+1.5MagnetFX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Fidelity International vs MagnetFX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Fidelity International vs MagnetFX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Fidelity International and MagnetFX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFidelity InternationalMagnetFX
Primary Legal NameFidelity InternationalMagnetFX
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressBeech Gate, Millfield Lane, Lower Kingswood, Tadworth, Surrey, KT20 6RP。Sona Topas Tower Lt. 18 Suite 1804 Jl. General Sudirman No. Kav. 26 DKI. Jakarta, 12920, Indonesia
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesWealth management, Stocks, FundsForeign exchange, gold, silver, crude oil, US index
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Fidelity International and MagnetFX against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Fidelity International vs MagnetFX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Fidelity International or MagnetFX?

MagnetFX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, Fidelity International maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MagnetFX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (ICDX, ICDX) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Fidelity International and MagnetFX?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Fidelity International records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with MagnetFX at 6.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.5, Brand: 6.5, Market Influence: 6.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do Fidelity International and MagnetFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Fidelity International lists Wealth management, Stocks, Funds with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while MagnetFX lists Foreign exchange, gold, silver, crude oil, US index with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Fidelity International or MagnetFX?

Fidelity International carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MagnetFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Fidelity International vs MagnetFX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk