Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Cetus vs MagnetFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Cetus (Cetus) and MagnetFX (MagnetFX) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

Cetus 6D Score
3.0
MagnetFX 6D Score
6.5
Regulated Licences
0 vs 2
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: cetus-vs-magnetfx

MagnetFX outranks Cetus by +3.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.5 vs 3.0)

On supervisory breadth, Cetus holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MagnetFX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightCetusMagnetFXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite3.06.5+3.5MagnetFX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight3.06.5+3.5MagnetFX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight2.04.0+2.0MagnetFX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight3.06.5+3.5MagnetFX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight3.06.5+3.5MagnetFX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Cetus vs MagnetFX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Cetus vs MagnetFX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Cetus and MagnetFX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeCetusMagnetFX
Primary Legal NameCetusMagnetFX
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressInternationalSona Topas Tower Lt. 18 Suite 1804 Jl. General Sudirman No. Kav. 26 DKI. Jakarta, 12920, Indonesia
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesTradingForeign exchange, gold, silver, crude oil, US index
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Cetus and MagnetFX against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Cetus vs MagnetFX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Cetus or MagnetFX?

MagnetFX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, Cetus maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MagnetFX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (ICDX, ICDX) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Cetus and MagnetFX?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Cetus records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with MagnetFX at 6.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.5, Brand: 6.5, Market Influence: 6.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do Cetus and MagnetFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Cetus lists Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while MagnetFX lists Foreign exchange, gold, silver, crude oil, US index with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Cetus or MagnetFX?

Cetus carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MagnetFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Cetus vs MagnetFX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk