1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
bitFlyer vs Jalatama: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of bitFlyer (bitFlyer) and Jalatama (Jalatama Artha Berjangka) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- bitFlyer 6D Score
- 5.0
- Jalatama 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 4 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
bitFlyer and Jalatama are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, bitFlyer holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Jalatama holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | bitFlyer | Jalatama | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: bitFlyer vs Jalatama
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | bitFlyer | Jalatama |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | bitFlyer | Jalatama Artha Berjangka |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 4 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | BAPPEBTI: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Midtown Tower, 9-7-1 Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-6233, Japan | Soho Capital Lt. 36 Suite 3606, Jl Letjend S. Parman Kav 28, Tanjung Duren Selatan, Grogol Petamburan, Jakarta Barat 11470 Gedung Menara Rajawali,Lt.23 Jl. DR.Ide Anak Agung Gde Kawasan Mega Kuningan - Jakarta 12950 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products | Indices, Forex, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Other languages, English, Japanese | Indonesian, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare bitFlyer and Jalatama against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: bitFlyer vs Jalatama
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: bitFlyer or Jalatama?
bitFlyer holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 1). Specifically, bitFlyer maintains 4 total recorded filing(s) (NYSDFS, FSA, SEC, CSSF) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Jalatama maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (BAPPEBTI) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between bitFlyer and Jalatama?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), bitFlyer records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Jalatama at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do bitFlyer and Jalatama differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
bitFlyer lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Jalatama lists Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: bitFlyer or Jalatama?
bitFlyer carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Jalatama carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.