Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

ATC Brokers vs GIB: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of ATC Brokers (ATC Brokers) and GIB (Global Intra Berjangka) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

ATC Brokers 6D Score
6.0
GIB 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 2
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: atc-brokers-vs-gib

ATC Brokers outranks GIB by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, ATC Brokers holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas GIB holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightATC BrokersGIBScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.05.0+1.0ATC Brokers
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.05.0+1.0ATC Brokers
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.05.0+1.0ATC Brokers
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: ATC Brokers vs GIB

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: ATC Brokers vs GIB
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between ATC Brokers and GIB.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeATC BrokersGIB
Primary Legal NameATC BrokersGlobal Intra Berjangka
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressNo 1 Poultry London EC2R 8EJ United KingdomGedung AXA Tower, Kuningan City lt. 38 Jl. Prof. Dr. Satrio Kav. 18, Jakarta Selatan 12490
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForex, Futures, OptionsForex, gold and silver indices, crude oil indices, index stocks, multilateral contracts
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare ATC Brokers and GIB against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: ATC Brokers vs GIB

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: ATC Brokers or GIB?

Both ATC Brokers and GIB hold 2 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, ATC Brokers maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (NFA, CIMA, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas GIB maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (ICDX, Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between ATC Brokers and GIB?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), ATC Brokers records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with GIB at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do ATC Brokers and GIB differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

ATC Brokers lists Forex, Futures, Options with execution software [MT4], while GIB lists Forex, gold and silver indices, crude oil indices, index stocks, multilateral contracts with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: ATC Brokers or GIB?

ATC Brokers carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while GIB carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

ATC Brokers vs GIB (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk