Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

ATC Brokers vs Far Eastern: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of ATC Brokers (ATC Brokers) and Far Eastern (Far Eastern Int'l Bank) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

ATC Brokers 6D Score
6.0
Far Eastern 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: atc-brokers-vs-far-eastern

ATC Brokers outranks Far Eastern by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, ATC Brokers holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Far Eastern holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightATC BrokersFar EasternScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.05.0+1.0ATC Brokers
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.05.0+1.0ATC Brokers
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.05.0+1.0ATC Brokers
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: ATC Brokers vs Far Eastern

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: ATC Brokers vs Far Eastern
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between ATC Brokers and Far Eastern.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeATC BrokersFar Eastern
Primary Legal NameATC BrokersFar Eastern Int'l Bank
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
FSB: Not supplied
Registered Domicile / AddressNo 1 Poultry London EC2R 8EJ United Kingdom13F, NO.16 Xinzhan Road, Banqiao District, New Taipei, City 220, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForex, Futures, OptionsForex
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishChinese, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare ATC Brokers and Far Eastern against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: ATC Brokers vs Far Eastern

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: ATC Brokers or Far Eastern?

ATC Brokers holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, ATC Brokers maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (NFA, CIMA, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Far Eastern maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FSB) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between ATC Brokers and Far Eastern?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), ATC Brokers records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Far Eastern at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do ATC Brokers and Far Eastern differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

ATC Brokers lists Forex, Futures, Options with execution software [MT4], while Far Eastern lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: ATC Brokers or Far Eastern?

ATC Brokers carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Far Eastern carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

ATC Brokers vs Far Eastern (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk