Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

APME FX vs Latinus Capital: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of APME FX (APME FX TRADING EUROPE Ltd) and Latinus Capital (Latinus Capital SRL) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

APME FX 6D Score
6.0
Latinus Capital 6D Score
1.6
Regulated Licences
2 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: apme-fx-vs-latinus-capital

APME FX outranks Latinus Capital by +4.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 1.6)

On supervisory breadth, APME FX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Latinus Capital holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightAPME FXLatinus CapitalScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.01.6+4.4APME FX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.01.6+4.4APME FX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.01.0+2.0APME FX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.01.6+4.4APME FX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.01.6+4.4APME FX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: APME FX vs Latinus Capital

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: APME FX vs Latinus Capital
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between APME FX and Latinus Capital.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeAPME FXLatinus Capital
Primary Legal NameAPME FX TRADING EUROPE LtdLatinus Capital SRL
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
CYSEC: #335/17CONSOB: Not supplied
None on file
Registered Domicile / AddressSpyrou Kyprianou 25,Floor 1/Office 103, 3070 , Limassol, CyprusDe la Esquina Noroeste de la Iglesia Catolica, 200m al este y 25m al norte casa de muro blanco. Heredia San Rafael Costa Rica. / Paseo Opera #2 Interior 305, Lomas de Angelópolis, San Andrés Choula Puebla, Puebla 72830 México.
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesOptions, futures, swaps, forwardsPrecious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Energies
Execution Software & TerminalsMT5MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishSpanish, Portuguese, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare APME FX and Latinus Capital against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: APME FX vs Latinus Capital

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: APME FX or Latinus Capital?

APME FX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, APME FX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, CONSOB) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Latinus Capital maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between APME FX and Latinus Capital?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), APME FX records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Latinus Capital at 1.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.6, Brand: 1.6, Market Influence: 1.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do APME FX and Latinus Capital differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

APME FX lists Options, futures, swaps, forwards with execution software [MT5], while Latinus Capital lists Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Energies with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: APME FX or Latinus Capital?

APME FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Latinus Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

APME FX vs Latinus Capital (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk