Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

APME FX vs Far Eastern: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of APME FX (APME FX TRADING EUROPE Ltd) and Far Eastern (Far Eastern Int'l Bank) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

APME FX 6D Score
6.0
Far Eastern 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: apme-fx-vs-far-eastern

APME FX outranks Far Eastern by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, APME FX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Far Eastern holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightAPME FXFar EasternScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.05.0+1.0APME FX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.05.0+1.0APME FX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.05.0+1.0APME FX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.05.0+1.0APME FX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: APME FX vs Far Eastern

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: APME FX vs Far Eastern
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between APME FX and Far Eastern.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeAPME FXFar Eastern
Primary Legal NameAPME FX TRADING EUROPE LtdFar Eastern Int'l Bank
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
CYSEC: #335/17CONSOB: Not supplied
FSB: Not supplied
Registered Domicile / AddressSpyrou Kyprianou 25,Floor 1/Office 103, 3070 , Limassol, Cyprus13F, NO.16 Xinzhan Road, Banqiao District, New Taipei, City 220, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesOptions, futures, swaps, forwardsForex
Execution Software & TerminalsMT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishChinese, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare APME FX and Far Eastern against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: APME FX vs Far Eastern

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: APME FX or Far Eastern?

APME FX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, APME FX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, CONSOB) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Far Eastern maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FSB) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between APME FX and Far Eastern?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), APME FX records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Far Eastern at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do APME FX and Far Eastern differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

APME FX lists Options, futures, swaps, forwards with execution software [MT5], while Far Eastern lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: APME FX or Far Eastern?

APME FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Far Eastern carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

APME FX vs Far Eastern (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk