1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
APME FX vs DeDust: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of APME FX (APME FX TRADING EUROPE Ltd) and DeDust (DeDust) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- APME FX 6D Score
- 6.0
- DeDust 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
APME FX outranks DeDust by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, APME FX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas DeDust holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | APME FX | DeDust | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 2.0 | +4.0 | APME FX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 2.0 | +4.0 | APME FX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | APME FX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 2.0 | +4.0 | APME FX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 2.0 | +4.0 | APME FX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: APME FX vs DeDust
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | APME FX | DeDust |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | APME FX TRADING EUROPE Ltd | DeDust |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | CYSEC: #335/17CONSOB: Not supplied | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Spyrou Kyprianou 25,Floor 1/Office 103, 3070 , Limassol, Cyprus | CH |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Options, futures, swaps, forwards | Trading |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare APME FX and DeDust against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: APME FX vs DeDust
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: APME FX or DeDust?
APME FX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, APME FX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, CONSOB) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas DeDust maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between APME FX and DeDust?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), APME FX records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with DeDust at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do APME FX and DeDust differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
APME FX lists Options, futures, swaps, forwards with execution software [MT5], while DeDust lists Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: APME FX or DeDust?
APME FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while DeDust carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.