1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
APME FX vs Beverly Hills: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of APME FX (APME FX TRADING EUROPE Ltd) and Beverly Hills (Beverly Hills) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- APME FX 6D Score
- 6.0
- Beverly Hills 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
APME FX outranks Beverly Hills by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, APME FX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Beverly Hills holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | APME FX | Beverly Hills | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | APME FX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | APME FX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | APME FX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | APME FX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: APME FX vs Beverly Hills
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | APME FX | Beverly Hills |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | APME FX TRADING EUROPE Ltd | Beverly Hills |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | CYSEC: #335/17CONSOB: Not supplied | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Spyrou Kyprianou 25,Floor 1/Office 103, 3070 , Limassol, Cyprus | 811 N Doheny Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90210-3528 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Options, futures, swaps, forwards | Futures, options, stocks, fixed income, alternative investments, algorithmic trading, investment grade diamonds |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare APME FX and Beverly Hills against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: APME FX vs Beverly Hills
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: APME FX or Beverly Hills?
APME FX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, APME FX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, CONSOB) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Beverly Hills maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between APME FX and Beverly Hills?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), APME FX records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Beverly Hills at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do APME FX and Beverly Hills differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
APME FX lists Options, futures, swaps, forwards with execution software [MT5], while Beverly Hills lists Futures, options, stocks, fixed income, alternative investments, algorithmic trading, investment grade diamonds with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: APME FX or Beverly Hills?
APME FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Beverly Hills carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.