1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
AGL vs DF Markets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of AGL (ABans Global Limited) and DF Markets (DF Markets) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- AGL 6D Score
- 5.0
- DF Markets 6D Score
- 3.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
AGL outranks DF Markets by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, AGL holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas DF Markets holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | AGL | DF Markets | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | AGL |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | AGL |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | AGL |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | AGL |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: AGL vs DF Markets
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | AGL | DF Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | ABans Global Limited | DF Markets |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 3rd Floor, 19 Gerrard Street, W1D 6JG. London, UK | GB |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex, Futures |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare AGL and DF Markets against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: AGL vs DF Markets
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: AGL or DF Markets?
AGL holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, AGL maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas DF Markets maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between AGL and DF Markets?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), AGL records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with DF Markets at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do AGL and DF Markets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
AGL lists general financial services with execution software [MT5], while DF Markets lists Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex, Futures with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: AGL or DF Markets?
AGL carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while DF Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.