1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
OFX vs RockGlobal: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of OFX (OzForex Limited) and RockGlobal (Rockfort Markets Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- OFX 6D Score
- 5.0
- RockGlobal 6D Score
- 5.5
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
RockGlobal outranks OFX by +0.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.5 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, OFX holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas RockGlobal holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | OFX | RockGlobal | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.5 | +0.5 | RockGlobal |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.5 | +0.5 | RockGlobal |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.5 | +0.5 | RockGlobal |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.5 | +0.5 | RockGlobal |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: OFX vs RockGlobal
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | OFX | RockGlobal |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | OzForex Limited | Rockfort Markets Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Level 19, 60 Margaret Street, SYDNEY NSW 2000 | Level 2, 22 Fanshawe Street, Auckland Central, Auckland 1010; PO Box 5382, Victoria Street West, Auckland/2nd Floor, Reigate Building, P.O. Box 356, Kingstown, St Vincent and the Grenadines. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, exchange rates, contracts | Stock indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Options |
| Execution Software & Terminals | OFX Business AU | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese, English | Chinese (Simplified), English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare OFX and RockGlobal against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: OFX vs RockGlobal
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: OFX or RockGlobal?
Both OFX and RockGlobal hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, OFX maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas RockGlobal maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between OFX and RockGlobal?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), OFX records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with RockGlobal at 5.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.5, Brand: 5.5, Market Influence: 5.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do OFX and RockGlobal differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
OFX lists Forex, exchange rates, contracts with execution software [OFX Business AU], while RockGlobal lists Stock indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Options with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: OFX or RockGlobal?
OFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while RockGlobal carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.