Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

MagnetFX vs RLC: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of MagnetFX (MagnetFX) and RLC (Hong Kong Red Lion Capital Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

MagnetFX 6D Score
6.5
RLC 6D Score
4.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 2
Warning Flags
0 vs 1
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: magnetfx-vs-rlc

MagnetFX outranks RLC by +2.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.5 vs 4.0)

On supervisory breadth, MagnetFX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas RLC holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 1 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightMagnetFXRLCScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.54.0+2.5MagnetFX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.54.0+2.5MagnetFX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.04.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.54.0+2.5MagnetFX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.54.0+2.5MagnetFX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: MagnetFX vs RLC

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: MagnetFX vs RLC
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between MagnetFX and RLC.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeMagnetFXRLC
Primary Legal NameMagnetFXHong Kong Red Lion Capital Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressSona Topas Tower Lt. 18 Suite 1804 Jl. General Sudirman No. Kav. 26 DKI. Jakarta, 12920, IndonesiaFlat F, 10/F, Comfort Building, 88, Nathan Road, Tsimshatsui, Kowloon, Hong Kong 10/F Blk F Comfort Building, 86-88A Nathan Road, Tsimshatsui, Hong Kong
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForeign exchange, gold, silver, crude oil, US indexLondon silver, London gold
Execution Software & TerminalsMT5MT4
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)1 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare MagnetFX and RLC against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: MagnetFX vs RLC

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: MagnetFX or RLC?

Both MagnetFX and RLC hold 2 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, MagnetFX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (ICDX, ICDX) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas RLC maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (HKGX, CGSE) with 1 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between MagnetFX and RLC?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), MagnetFX records an Overall Score of 6.5 (Risk & Licensing: 6.5, Brand: 6.5, Market Influence: 6.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with RLC at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do MagnetFX and RLC differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

MagnetFX lists Foreign exchange, gold, silver, crude oil, US index with execution software [MT5], while RLC lists London silver, London gold with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: MagnetFX or RLC?

MagnetFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while RLC carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

MagnetFX vs RLC (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk