1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Larson&Holz vs SCDEX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Larson&Holz (Larson&Holz Ltd.) and SCDEX (SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- Larson&Holz 6D Score
- 1.0
- SCDEX 6D Score
- 9.3
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
SCDEX outranks Larson&Holz by +8.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (9.3 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, Larson&Holz holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SCDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Larson&Holz | SCDEX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 9.3 | +8.3 | SCDEX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 9.5 | +8.5 | SCDEX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 9.3 | +8.3 | SCDEX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 9.2 | +9.2 | SCDEX |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 9.4 | +8.4 | SCDEX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 9.1 | +8.1 | SCDEX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Larson&Holz vs SCDEX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Larson&Holz | SCDEX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Larson&Holz Ltd. | SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Low risk |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | HK | 1312 17th Street Suite 692, Denver, COLORADO 80202 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | CFDs, Commodities, Forex, Stocks, Options | Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Larson&Holz and SCDEX against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Larson&Holz vs SCDEX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Larson&Holz or SCDEX?
Both Larson&Holz and SCDEX hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Larson&Holz maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SCDEX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (NFA, FinCEN) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Larson&Holz and SCDEX?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Larson&Holz records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with SCDEX at 9.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 9.5, Brand: 9.4, Market Influence: 9.1, User Reputation: 9.2, Execution & Software: 9.3).
How do Larson&Holz and SCDEX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Larson&Holz lists CFDs, Commodities, Forex, Stocks, Options with execution software [MT5], while SCDEX lists Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances with execution software [SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Larson&Holz or SCDEX?
Larson&Holz carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SCDEX carries a "Low risk" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.