1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Larson&Holz vs PLOTIO: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Larson&Holz (Larson&Holz Ltd.) and PLOTIO (PLOTIO) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- Larson&Holz 6D Score
- 1.0
- PLOTIO 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
PLOTIO outranks Larson&Holz by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, Larson&Holz holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PLOTIO holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Larson&Holz | PLOTIO | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | PLOTIO |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | PLOTIO |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 4.0 | +3.0 | PLOTIO |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 6.0 | +5.0 | PLOTIO |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 6.0 | +5.0 | PLOTIO |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Larson&Holz vs PLOTIO
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Larson&Holz | PLOTIO |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Larson&Holz Ltd. | PLOTIO |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | HK | Capital Union Building, Suite 6, Lyford Cay, West Bay Street, Nassau, The Bahamas 1st Floor, The Sotheby Building, Rodney Bay, Gros-Islet, Castries, Saint Lucia |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | CFDs, Commodities, Forex, Stocks, Options | Spot and CFDs commodities such as gold, silver, currency CFDs, crude oil futures, natural gas futures and indices |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Larson&Holz and PLOTIO against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Larson&Holz vs PLOTIO
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Larson&Holz or PLOTIO?
PLOTIO holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, Larson&Holz maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PLOTIO maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (CGSE, ASIC, SCB) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Larson&Holz and PLOTIO?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Larson&Holz records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with PLOTIO at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Larson&Holz and PLOTIO differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Larson&Holz lists CFDs, Commodities, Forex, Stocks, Options with execution software [MT5], while PLOTIO lists Spot and CFDs commodities such as gold, silver, currency CFDs, crude oil futures, natural gas futures and indices with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Larson&Holz or PLOTIO?
Larson&Holz carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PLOTIO carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.