Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Jalatama vs MIBD: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Jalatama (Jalatama Artha Berjangka) and MIBD (Marigold International Bullion limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

Jalatama 6D Score
5.0
MIBD 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: jalatama-vs-mibd

Jalatama and MIBD are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Jalatama holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MIBD holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightJalatamaMIBDScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Jalatama vs MIBD

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Jalatama vs MIBD
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Jalatama and MIBD.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeJalatamaMIBD
Primary Legal NameJalatama Artha BerjangkaMarigold International Bullion limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
BAPPEBTI: Not supplied
Registered Domicile / AddressSoho Capital Lt. 36 Suite 3606, Jl Letjend S. Parman Kav 28, Tanjung Duren Selatan, Grogol Petamburan, Jakarta Barat 11470 Gedung Menara Rajawali,Lt.23 Jl. DR.Ide Anak Agung Gde Kawasan Mega Kuningan - Jakarta 1295018F, MG Tower, No.133 Hoi Bun Road, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong(MTR Kwun Tong line: Ngau Tau Kok Station exit B6)
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesIndices, Forex, CommoditiesForex, Stocks, Futures, Gold, Silver
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesIndonesian, EnglishChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Jalatama and MIBD against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Jalatama vs MIBD

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Jalatama or MIBD?

Both Jalatama and MIBD hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Jalatama maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (BAPPEBTI) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MIBD maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CGSE) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Jalatama and MIBD?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Jalatama records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with MIBD at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do Jalatama and MIBD differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Jalatama lists Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while MIBD lists Forex, Stocks, Futures, Gold, Silver with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Jalatama or MIBD?

Jalatama carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MIBD carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Jalatama vs MIBD (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk