Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

IronFX vs TPFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of IronFX (Notesco Financial Services Limited.) and TPFX (PT Trijaya Pratama Futures) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

IronFX 6D Score
3.0
TPFX 6D Score
4.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: ironfx-vs-tpfx

TPFX outranks IronFX by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (4.0 vs 3.0)

On supervisory breadth, IronFX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas TPFX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightIronFXTPFXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite3.04.0+1.0TPFX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight3.04.0+1.0TPFX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight3.04.0+1.0TPFX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight3.04.0+1.0TPFX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: IronFX vs TPFX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: IronFX vs TPFX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between IronFX and TPFX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeIronFXTPFX
Primary Legal NameNotesco Financial Services Limited.PT Trijaya Pratama Futures
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / Address12Th Floor, The BroadGaTe Tower 20 PriMrose STreeT London EC2A 2EW UNITED KINGDOMSahid sudirman center, lantai 20A&E Jln. Jend Sudirman No. 86, RT.10/RW.11 Kelurahan Karet Tengsin, Kecamatan Tanah Abang, Jakarta Pusat DKI Jakarta
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesIndices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Metals, CommoditiesCommodities, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4MT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishIndonesian
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare IronFX and TPFX against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: IronFX vs TPFX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: IronFX or TPFX?

IronFX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, IronFX maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, Financial Conduct Authority, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas TPFX maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between IronFX and TPFX?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), IronFX records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with TPFX at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do IronFX and TPFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

IronFX lists Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Metals, Commodities with execution software [MT4], while TPFX lists Commodities, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: IronFX or TPFX?

IronFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while TPFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

IronFX vs TPFX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk