Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Inter Pan vs Pepperstone: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Inter Pan (PT. INTER PAN PASIFIK FUTURES) and Pepperstone (PEPPERSTONE GROUP LIMITED) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

Inter Pan 6D Score
5.0
Pepperstone 6D Score
7.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 4
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: inter-pan-vs-pepperstone

Pepperstone outranks Inter Pan by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Inter Pan holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Pepperstone holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 6 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightInter PanPepperstoneScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.07.0+2.0Pepperstone
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.06.0+1.0Pepperstone
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.05.0+2.0Pepperstone
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.07.0+2.0Pepperstone
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.07.0+2.0Pepperstone

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Inter Pan vs Pepperstone

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Inter Pan vs Pepperstone
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Inter Pan and Pepperstone.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeInter PanPepperstone
Primary Legal NamePT. INTER PAN PASIFIK FUTURESPEPPERSTONE GROUP LIMITED
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)4 regulated / 6 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressLippo St. Moritz Office Tower Lt.10 Unit. 1005, Jl. Puri Indah Raya Blok U1 Kembangan, Jakarta Barat 11610.Level 16, Tower One, 727 Collins Street Melbourne, VIC Australia 3008 Sea Sky Lane, B201 Sandyport, Nassau New Providence, The Bahamas
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesFX, indices, commodities, multiple sideFX trading, commodities, index CFDs, stock CFDs and related services
Execution Software & TerminalsMT5MT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Vietnamese, English, Thai
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Inter Pan and Pepperstone against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Inter Pan vs Pepperstone

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Inter Pan or Pepperstone?

Pepperstone holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 2). Specifically, Inter Pan maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (ICDX, ICDX) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Pepperstone maintains 6 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, ASIC, DFSA, SCB) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Inter Pan and Pepperstone?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Inter Pan records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Pepperstone at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).

How do Inter Pan and Pepperstone differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Inter Pan lists FX, indices, commodities, multiple side with execution software [MT5], while Pepperstone lists FX trading, commodities, index CFDs, stock CFDs and related services with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Inter Pan or Pepperstone?

Inter Pan carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Pepperstone carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Inter Pan vs Pepperstone (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk