1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Inter Pan vs IronFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Inter Pan (PT. INTER PAN PASIFIK FUTURES) and IronFX (Notesco Financial Services Limited.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- Inter Pan 6D Score
- 5.0
- IronFX 6D Score
- 3.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Inter Pan outranks IronFX by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, Inter Pan holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas IronFX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Inter Pan | IronFX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Inter Pan |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Inter Pan |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Inter Pan |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Inter Pan |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Inter Pan |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Inter Pan vs IronFX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Inter Pan | IronFX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | PT. INTER PAN PASIFIK FUTURES | Notesco Financial Services Limited. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Lippo St. Moritz Office Tower Lt.10 Unit. 1005, Jl. Puri Indah Raya Blok U1 Kembangan, Jakarta Barat 11610. | 12Th Floor, The BroadGaTe Tower 20 PriMrose STreeT London EC2A 2EW UNITED KINGDOM |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, indices, commodities, multiple side | Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Metals, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Inter Pan and IronFX against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Inter Pan vs IronFX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Inter Pan or IronFX?
Both Inter Pan and IronFX hold 2 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Inter Pan maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (ICDX, ICDX) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas IronFX maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, Financial Conduct Authority, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Inter Pan and IronFX?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Inter Pan records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with IronFX at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Inter Pan and IronFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Inter Pan lists FX, indices, commodities, multiple side with execution software [MT5], while IronFX lists Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Metals, Commodities with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Inter Pan or IronFX?
Inter Pan carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while IronFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.