Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Gold Fun vs SCDEX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Gold Fun (Gold Fun Corporation Ltd) and SCDEX (SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

Gold Fun 6D Score
5.0
SCDEX 6D Score
9.3
Regulated Licences
1 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: gold-fun-vs-scdex

SCDEX outranks Gold Fun by +4.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (9.3 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Gold Fun holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SCDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightGold FunSCDEXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.09.3+4.3SCDEX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.09.5+4.5SCDEX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.09.3+6.3SCDEX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.09.2+9.2SCDEX
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.09.4+4.4SCDEX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.09.1+4.1SCDEX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Gold Fun vs SCDEX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Gold Fun vs SCDEX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Gold Fun and SCDEX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeGold FunSCDEX
Primary Legal NameGold Fun Corporation LtdSCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedLow risk
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressHong Kong Kowloon Hung Hom Sung On Street 18 Peninsula Square 15/F Room 1508 Hong Kong Kowloon Hung Hom Tak Fung Street 18 Harbourfront Landmark Tower 1 26/F Room 26101312 17th Street Suite 692, Denver, COLORADO 80202
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesSmelting services, diamond jewelry, 12kg gold ingots, pure gold bars, real-time trading software, gold futures, storage services, tailor-made transactions, GF gold trading, gold investment, ore goldCrypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances
Execution Software & TerminalsMT5SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional)English, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Gold Fun and SCDEX against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Gold Fun vs SCDEX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Gold Fun or SCDEX?

Gold Fun holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Gold Fun maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CGSE) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SCDEX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (NFA, FinCEN) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Gold Fun and SCDEX?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Gold Fun records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with SCDEX at 9.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 9.5, Brand: 9.4, Market Influence: 9.1, User Reputation: 9.2, Execution & Software: 9.3).

How do Gold Fun and SCDEX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Gold Fun lists Smelting services, diamond jewelry, 12kg gold ingots, pure gold bars, real-time trading software, gold futures, storage services, tailor-made transactions, GF gold trading, gold investment, ore gold with execution software [MT5], while SCDEX lists Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances with execution software [SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Gold Fun or SCDEX?

Gold Fun carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SCDEX carries a "Low risk" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Gold Fun vs SCDEX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk