1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Glassnode vs Great Bright: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Glassnode (Glassnode) and Great Bright (Weihui International Holdings Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- Glassnode 6D Score
- 2.0
- Great Bright 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Great Bright outranks Glassnode by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Glassnode holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Great Bright holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Glassnode | Great Bright | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Great Bright |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Great Bright |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Great Bright |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Great Bright |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Great Bright |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Glassnode vs Great Bright
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Glassnode | Great Bright |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Glassnode | Weihui International Holdings Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | CH | Hong Kong New Territories Tsuen Wan Texaco Road 62-70 Po Yip Building B Tower 14/F Room 8 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | mainly precious metals, including London gold and London silver |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Glassnode and Great Bright against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Glassnode vs Great Bright
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Glassnode or Great Bright?
Great Bright holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Glassnode maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Great Bright maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CGSE) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Glassnode and Great Bright?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Glassnode records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Great Bright at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Glassnode and Great Bright differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Glassnode lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Great Bright lists mainly precious metals, including London gold and London silver with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Glassnode or Great Bright?
Glassnode carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Great Bright carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.