Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

GIB vs RockGlobal: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of GIB (Global Intra Berjangka) and RockGlobal (Rockfort Markets Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

GIB 6D Score
5.0
RockGlobal 6D Score
5.5
Regulated Licences
2 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: gib-vs-rockglobal

RockGlobal outranks GIB by +0.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.5 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, GIB holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas RockGlobal holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightGIBRockGlobalScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.05.5+0.5RockGlobal
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.05.5+0.5RockGlobal
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.05.5+0.5RockGlobal
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.05.5+0.5RockGlobal

Visual Architecture Benchmark: GIB vs RockGlobal

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: GIB vs RockGlobal
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between GIB and RockGlobal.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeGIBRockGlobal
Primary Legal NameGlobal Intra BerjangkaRockfort Markets Ltd
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressGedung AXA Tower, Kuningan City lt. 38 Jl. Prof. Dr. Satrio Kav. 18, Jakarta Selatan 12490Level 2, 22 Fanshawe Street, Auckland Central, Auckland 1010; PO Box 5382, Victoria Street West, Auckland/2nd Floor, Reigate Building, P.O. Box 356, Kingstown, St Vincent and the Grenadines.
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForex, gold and silver indices, crude oil indices, index stocks, multilateral contractsStock indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Options
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishChinese (Simplified), English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare GIB and RockGlobal against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: GIB vs RockGlobal

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: GIB or RockGlobal?

GIB holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, GIB maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (ICDX, Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas RockGlobal maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between GIB and RockGlobal?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), GIB records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with RockGlobal at 5.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.5, Brand: 5.5, Market Influence: 5.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do GIB and RockGlobal differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

GIB lists Forex, gold and silver indices, crude oil indices, index stocks, multilateral contracts with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while RockGlobal lists Stock indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Options with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: GIB or RockGlobal?

GIB carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while RockGlobal carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

GIB vs RockGlobal (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk