1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
GIB vs Matsui Securities: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of GIB (Global Intra Berjangka) and Matsui Securities (Matsui Securities Co., Ltd.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- GIB 6D Score
- 5.0
- Matsui Securities 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
GIB and Matsui Securities are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, GIB holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Matsui Securities holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | GIB | Matsui Securities | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | GIB |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: GIB vs Matsui Securities
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | GIB | Matsui Securities |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Global Intra Berjangka | Matsui Securities Co., Ltd. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Gedung AXA Tower, Kuningan City lt. 38 Jl. Prof. Dr. Satrio Kav. 18, Jakarta Selatan 12490 | 1-4, Kojimachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8516 Japan |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, gold and silver indices, crude oil indices, index stocks, multilateral contracts | Forex, Stocks, Futures, Options |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English, Japanese |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare GIB and Matsui Securities against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: GIB vs Matsui Securities
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: GIB or Matsui Securities?
GIB holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, GIB maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (ICDX, Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Matsui Securities maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FSA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between GIB and Matsui Securities?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), GIB records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Matsui Securities at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do GIB and Matsui Securities differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
GIB lists Forex, gold and silver indices, crude oil indices, index stocks, multilateral contracts with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Matsui Securities lists Forex, Stocks, Futures, Options with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: GIB or Matsui Securities?
GIB carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Matsui Securities carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.