1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
GIB vs Gold Fun: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of GIB (Global Intra Berjangka) and Gold Fun (Gold Fun Corporation Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- GIB 6D Score
- 5.0
- Gold Fun 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
GIB and Gold Fun are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, GIB holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Gold Fun holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | GIB | Gold Fun | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: GIB vs Gold Fun
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | GIB | Gold Fun |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Global Intra Berjangka | Gold Fun Corporation Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Gedung AXA Tower, Kuningan City lt. 38 Jl. Prof. Dr. Satrio Kav. 18, Jakarta Selatan 12490 | Hong Kong Kowloon Hung Hom Sung On Street 18 Peninsula Square 15/F Room 1508 Hong Kong Kowloon Hung Hom Tak Fung Street 18 Harbourfront Landmark Tower 1 26/F Room 2610 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, gold and silver indices, crude oil indices, index stocks, multilateral contracts | Smelting services, diamond jewelry, 12kg gold ingots, pure gold bars, real-time trading software, gold futures, storage services, tailor-made transactions, GF gold trading, gold investment, ore gold |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional) |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare GIB and Gold Fun against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: GIB vs Gold Fun
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: GIB or Gold Fun?
GIB holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, GIB maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (ICDX, Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Gold Fun maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CGSE) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between GIB and Gold Fun?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), GIB records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Gold Fun at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do GIB and Gold Fun differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
GIB lists Forex, gold and silver indices, crude oil indices, index stocks, multilateral contracts with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Gold Fun lists Smelting services, diamond jewelry, 12kg gold ingots, pure gold bars, real-time trading software, gold futures, storage services, tailor-made transactions, GF gold trading, gold investment, ore gold with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: GIB or Gold Fun?
GIB carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Gold Fun carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.