Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

G.A.I vs KAB: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of G.A.I (G.A.I) and KAB (KAB STRATEGY LIMITED) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

G.A.I 6D Score
2.0
KAB 6D Score
2.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: g-a-i-vs-kab

G.A.I and KAB are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, G.A.I holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas KAB holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightG.A.IKABScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite2.02.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: G.A.I vs KAB

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: G.A.I vs KAB
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between G.A.I and KAB.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeG.A.IKAB
Primary Legal NameG.A.IKAB STRATEGY LIMITED
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
BAPPEBTI: Not supplied
Registered Domicile / AddressStreet Green Lake City, Rukan Crown Block M No. 2, Village Petir, Sub Distric Cipondoh, City Tangerang, Province Banten, Indonesia,Office 203, Stavrakis Court, 13 Griva Digeni Avenue, 6030 Larnaca, Cyprus
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesIndices, Forex, Stocks, CommoditiesFX, indices, metals, energy, spot FX and London gold silver
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4
Supported Client LanguagesForeign exchangeEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare G.A.I and KAB against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: G.A.I vs KAB

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: G.A.I or KAB?

Both G.A.I and KAB hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, G.A.I maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (BAPPEBTI) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas KAB maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CGSE) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between G.A.I and KAB?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), G.A.I records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with KAB at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do G.A.I and KAB differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

G.A.I lists Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while KAB lists FX, indices, metals, energy, spot FX and London gold silver with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: G.A.I or KAB?

G.A.I carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while KAB carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

G.A.I vs KAB (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk