Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FOO Markets vs SCDEX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FOO Markets (FOO Markets) and SCDEX (SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

FOO Markets 6D Score
1.0
SCDEX 6D Score
9.3
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: foo-markets-vs-scdex

SCDEX outranks FOO Markets by +8.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (9.3 vs 1.0)

On supervisory breadth, FOO Markets holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SCDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFOO MarketsSCDEXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite1.09.3+8.3SCDEX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight1.09.5+8.5SCDEX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.09.3+8.3SCDEX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.09.2+9.2SCDEX
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight1.09.4+8.4SCDEX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight1.09.1+8.1SCDEX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FOO Markets vs SCDEX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FOO Markets vs SCDEX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FOO Markets and SCDEX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFOO MarketsSCDEX
Primary Legal NameFOO MarketsSCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedLow risk
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressGovant Building,Kulum highway,Port Vila Vanuatu1312 17th Street Suite 692, Denver, COLORADO 80202
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesPrecious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Energies, CurrenciesCrypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishEnglish, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FOO Markets and SCDEX against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FOO Markets vs SCDEX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FOO Markets or SCDEX?

Both FOO Markets and SCDEX hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FOO Markets maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SCDEX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (NFA, FinCEN) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FOO Markets and SCDEX?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FOO Markets records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with SCDEX at 9.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 9.5, Brand: 9.4, Market Influence: 9.1, User Reputation: 9.2, Execution & Software: 9.3).

How do FOO Markets and SCDEX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FOO Markets lists Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Energies, Currencies with execution software [MT4], while SCDEX lists Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances with execution software [SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FOO Markets or SCDEX?

FOO Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SCDEX carries a "Low risk" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FOO Markets vs SCDEX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk