Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

DF Markets vs SCDEX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of DF Markets (DF Markets) and SCDEX (SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

DF Markets 6D Score
3.0
SCDEX 6D Score
9.3
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: df-markets-vs-scdex

SCDEX outranks DF Markets by +6.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (9.3 vs 3.0)

On supervisory breadth, DF Markets holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SCDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightDF MarketsSCDEXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite3.09.3+6.3SCDEX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.09.5+4.5SCDEX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.09.3+8.3SCDEX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.09.2+9.2SCDEX
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight2.09.4+7.4SCDEX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight2.09.1+7.1SCDEX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: DF Markets vs SCDEX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: DF Markets vs SCDEX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between DF Markets and SCDEX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeDF MarketsSCDEX
Primary Legal NameDF MarketsSCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedLow risk
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressGB1312 17th Street Suite 692, Denver, COLORADO 80202
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesPrecious metals, Stock indices, Forex, FuturesCrypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformSCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare DF Markets and SCDEX against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: DF Markets vs SCDEX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: DF Markets or SCDEX?

Both DF Markets and SCDEX hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, DF Markets maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SCDEX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (NFA, FinCEN) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between DF Markets and SCDEX?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), DF Markets records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with SCDEX at 9.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 9.5, Brand: 9.4, Market Influence: 9.1, User Reputation: 9.2, Execution & Software: 9.3).

How do DF Markets and SCDEX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

DF Markets lists Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex, Futures with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while SCDEX lists Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances with execution software [SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: DF Markets or SCDEX?

DF Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SCDEX carries a "Low risk" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

DF Markets vs SCDEX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk