1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Citypoint Trading vs Inter Pan: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Citypoint Trading (Citypoint Trading) and Inter Pan (PT. INTER PAN PASIFIK FUTURES) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- Citypoint Trading 6D Score
- 1.0
- Inter Pan 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Inter Pan outranks Citypoint Trading by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, Citypoint Trading holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Inter Pan holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Citypoint Trading | Inter Pan | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | Inter Pan |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | Inter Pan |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Inter Pan |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | Inter Pan |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | Inter Pan |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Citypoint Trading vs Inter Pan
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Citypoint Trading | Inter Pan |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Citypoint Trading | PT. INTER PAN PASIFIK FUTURES |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 107 Cheapside London England EC2V 6DN | Lippo St. Moritz Office Tower Lt.10 Unit. 1005, Jl. Puri Indah Raya Blok U1 Kembangan, Jakarta Barat 11610. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stock CFDs, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Options, Commodities | FX, indices, commodities, multiple side |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Citypoint Trading and Inter Pan against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Citypoint Trading vs Inter Pan
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Citypoint Trading or Inter Pan?
Inter Pan holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, Citypoint Trading maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Inter Pan maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (ICDX, ICDX) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Citypoint Trading and Inter Pan?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Citypoint Trading records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Inter Pan at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Citypoint Trading and Inter Pan differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Citypoint Trading lists Stock CFDs, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Options, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Inter Pan lists FX, indices, commodities, multiple side with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Citypoint Trading or Inter Pan?
Citypoint Trading carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Inter Pan carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.