1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Cboe Digital vs tastyfx: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Cboe Digital (Cboe Global Markets Group) and tastyfx (tastyfx) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- Cboe Digital 6D Score
- 3.0
- tastyfx 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
tastyfx outranks Cboe Digital by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, Cboe Digital holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas tastyfx holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Cboe Digital | tastyfx | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | tastyfx |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | tastyfx |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | tastyfx |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | tastyfx |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | tastyfx |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Cboe Digital vs tastyfx
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Cboe Digital | tastyfx |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Cboe Global Markets Group | tastyfx |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | CFTC: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | US | 1330 WEST FULTON STREET, SUITE 610 CHICAGO 60607 IL United States |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | FX, price difference, futures |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | tastyfx: Forex Trading Broker |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Cboe Digital and tastyfx against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Cboe Digital vs tastyfx
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Cboe Digital or tastyfx?
Both Cboe Digital and tastyfx hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Cboe Digital maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CFTC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas tastyfx maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (NFA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Cboe Digital and tastyfx?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Cboe Digital records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with tastyfx at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Cboe Digital and tastyfx differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Cboe Digital lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while tastyfx lists FX, price difference, futures with execution software [tastyfx: Forex Trading Broker]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Cboe Digital or tastyfx?
Cboe Digital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while tastyfx carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.