Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Cannon Trading vs IB: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Cannon Trading (Cannon Trading Company, Inc.) and IB (Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

Cannon Trading 6D Score
5.0
IB 6D Score
8.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 5
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: cannon-trading-vs-ib

IB outranks Cannon Trading by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (8.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Cannon Trading holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas IB holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightCannon TradingIBScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.08.0+3.0IB
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.08.0+3.0IB
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.06.0+3.0IB
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.08.0+2.0IB
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.08.0+2.0IB

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Cannon Trading vs IB

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Cannon Trading vs IB
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Cannon Trading and IB.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeCannon TradingIB
Primary Legal NameCannon Trading Company, Inc.Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address12100 Wilshire Blvd Suite 1640 Los Angeles, CA 90025One Pickwick Plaza, Greenwich, CT 06830 USA
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesIndices, Forex, Stocks, CommoditiesStocks, options, futures, currencies, securities, etc.
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Portuguese, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Cannon Trading and IB against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Cannon Trading vs IB

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Cannon Trading or IB?

IB holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 1). Specifically, Cannon Trading maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (NFA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas IB maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (MAS, FSA, IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Cannon Trading and IB?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Cannon Trading records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with IB at 8.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 8.0, Brand: 8.0, Market Influence: 8.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 6.0).

How do Cannon Trading and IB differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Cannon Trading lists Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while IB lists Stocks, options, futures, currencies, securities, etc. with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Cannon Trading or IB?

Cannon Trading carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while IB carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Cannon Trading vs IB (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk