Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

BULBROKERS vs MagnetFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of BULBROKERS (Bulbrokers EAD) and MagnetFX (MagnetFX) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

BULBROKERS 6D Score
6.0
MagnetFX 6D Score
6.5
Regulated Licences
1 vs 2
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: bulbrokers-vs-magnetfx

MagnetFX outranks BULBROKERS by +0.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.5 vs 6.0)

On supervisory breadth, BULBROKERS holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MagnetFX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightBULBROKERSMagnetFXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.06.5+0.5MagnetFX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight4.06.5+2.5MagnetFX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.04.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.06.5+1.5MagnetFX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.06.5+0.5MagnetFX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: BULBROKERS vs MagnetFX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: BULBROKERS vs MagnetFX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between BULBROKERS and MagnetFX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeBULBROKERSMagnetFX
Primary Legal NameBulbrokers EADMagnetFX
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Financial Supervision Commission: Not supplied
Registered Domicile / Address14, Tzar Osvoboditel blvd. (Landmark centre)Sona Topas Tower Lt. 18 Suite 1804 Jl. General Sudirman No. Kav. 26 DKI. Jakarta, 12920, Indonesia
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCFDs, Indices, Stocks, Futures, Options, BondsForeign exchange, gold, silver, crude oil, US index
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4MT5
Supported Client LanguagesBulgarian, Romanian, Spanish, Italian, Polish, EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare BULBROKERS and MagnetFX against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: BULBROKERS vs MagnetFX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: BULBROKERS or MagnetFX?

MagnetFX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, BULBROKERS maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Supervision Commission) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MagnetFX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (ICDX, ICDX) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between BULBROKERS and MagnetFX?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), BULBROKERS records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with MagnetFX at 6.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.5, Brand: 6.5, Market Influence: 6.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do BULBROKERS and MagnetFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

BULBROKERS lists CFDs, Indices, Stocks, Futures, Options, Bonds with execution software [MT4], while MagnetFX lists Foreign exchange, gold, silver, crude oil, US index with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: BULBROKERS or MagnetFX?

BULBROKERS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MagnetFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

BULBROKERS vs MagnetFX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk